Backpackers' Pantry vs. Mountain House taste test

When you buy something through one of the links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

Backpacker’s Pantry Mountain House
  • More sweet breakfasts
  • Popular dishes from different cultures
  • More savory breakfasts
  • Home-style American classics
Avg. Cooking Time*
15-20 minutes 8-9 minutes
Weight & Packability
  • Avg. weight of 6.69 oz*
  • Pouches compress down flat
  • Avg. weight of 4.83 oz*
  • Pouches stand up easily
  • Higher vitamin and mineral content*
  • Organic and natural options
  • Lots of options for those with dietary restrictions
  • Flat, lightweight packaging
  • High-calorie meals
  • Low-sodium options
  • Consistent, great flavor
  • Shorter average cooking time*
  • Pleasant texture and appearance
  • Classic dinner options
  • Lighter pouches*
  • Worse flavor
  • Higher average cooking time*
  • Heavier pouches*
  • Poor aftertaste
  • Fewer calories per pouch*
Nutrition per Avg. Serving*
  • 379 calories
  • 56.5 g total carbs
  • 776 mg sodium (32.3% DV)
  • 15.9 g protein
  • Higher vitamin and mineral content
  • 271 calories
  • 29.2 g total carbs
  • 773 mg sodium (32.2% DV)
  • 12.3 g protein
Our Favorite Meals
Complete Taste Test Results
Backpacker’s Pantry rankings Mountain House rankings

* For the pouch option of the 10 meals we taste tested of this brand

Freeze-dried meals from Backpacker's Pantry and Mountain House

If there’s one thing we love more than backpacking, it’s backpacking food. I’m no professional foodie, but — when presented with the opportunity to referee a taste test between two of the biggest freeze-dried meal brands — you best believe I jumped on it.

Backpacker’s Pantry and Mountain House both sent our team 10 of their bestselling meals, 3 breakfasts and 7 entrees. We then judged and scrutinized these two brands’ meals on everything from packability and weight to nutritional content and quality of flavor.

For three. Hours. Straight.

What did we learn? Though they both make MREs, their meals are surprisingly different. Don’t believe me? Let’s get down to it.

Table of Contents

  1. Backpacker’s Pantry vs. Mountain House: Which Brand Is ‘Best’?
  2. Flavor: Who Makes Tastier Meals?
  3. Preparation: Whose Meals Are Easier to Make?
  4. Nutrition: Whose Meals Are More Nutritious?
  1. Cost: Who Offers More Bang for Your Buck?
  2. My Favorite Freeze-Dried Meals Come from Both Brands
  3. How We Compared

Backpacker’s Pantry vs. Mountain House: Which Brand Is ‘Best’?

Little Dirtbag

Both Mountain House and Backpacker’s Pantry have some delicious options. So, rather than focus on which brand is best, we encourage you to think about which individual meals are best.

After testing a total of 20 meals from both brands, these are our recommendations:

There are some differences between the two brands, though. Each brand likely has meals you’ll like, but we do offer the following brand-wide recommendations:

  • Best for people with food allergies/concerns: Backpacker’s Pantry
  • Highest Nutritional Content (on average): Backpacker’s Pantry
  • Easiest to Prep (on average): Mountain House

Flavor: Who Makes Tastier Meals?

Simply put, we think Mountain House’s meals taste better. Overall, the Mountain House meals received higher ratings for flavor in our taste tests than did the Backpacker’s Pantry meals.

For their breakfasts, Mountain House focuses more on creating savory dishes rather than sweet ones. The opposite goes for the Backpacker’s Pantry. If you love sweet breakfasts, you have got to go with BP, especially their Blueberry Walnut Oats & Quinoa.

For entrees, both brands focus on savory dishes, but Mountain House has really perfected the art of producing ooey, gooey, stick-to-your-insides, warm dinner deliciousness. As for Backpacker’s Pantry, their meals struggled to recreate complex flavor profiles like those found in pad thai. In many instances, it resulted in an off or synthetic taste.

Preparation: Whose Meals Are Easier to Make?

All 20 meals included in our test

The Mountain House meals we tested took, on average, 8-9 minutes to prepare. The Backpacker’s Pantry meals took on average 15-20 minutes — twice as long. If time is of the essence, Mountain House is usually your best bet.*

However, either brand will do if you don’t mind the waiting. Neither has challenging preparation instructions. Almost every meal that we sampled from both companies required us to just boil water, pour it in the pouch, and wait a certain number of minutes. There were only two exceptions.

The Huevos Rancheros from Backpacker’s Pantry requires you bust out your camp pots and pans to complete the cooking process, making it the most difficult to prep. But the Backpacker’s Pantry Granola with Bananas, Almonds & Milk takes no time at all. You simply add water (it can be hot or cold), stir, and enjoy.

* Editor’s Note: Elevation, ambient temperature, water temperature, and specific food profile all influence preparation time. Backpacker’s Pantry’s preparation instructions are designed for as wide a range of scenarios as possible, but you should always adjust them to your specific circumstances. In other words, your preparation time might be shorter or longer than 15-20 minutes. For the sake of uniformity in our taste test, we followed the preparation instructions on each package to a T. Our taste test took place at 6,500 feet during a warm summer night in Colorado.

Nutrition: Whose Meals Are More Nutritious?

To shed some light on who makes more nutritious meals, we averaged the Nutrition Facts labels of the 10 meals we taste tested of each brand.

Here is the side-by-side comparison. Keep in mind that these numbers are averages for a single serving of only the 10 meals we tested of each brand.

Avg. Serving, Backpacker’s Pantry Avg. Serving, Mountain House
Calories 379 271
Total Fat 11.1 g 11.3 g
Saturated Fat 4.15 g 3.4 g
Sodium 776 mg 773 mg
Total Carbs 56.5 g 29.2 g
Dietary Fiber 8.5 g 2.1 g
Sugar 10.5 g 4.4 g
Protein 15.9 g 12.3 g
Vitamin A 33.8% DV 9.4% DV
Vitamin C 55.1% DV 15.2% DV
Calcium 17.7% DV 10.9% DV
Iron 38.3% DV 10% DV

A single serving of a Backpacker’s Pantry meal tends to be higher in calories, total carbs (including dietary fiber and sugar), protein, vitamin A, vitamin C, calcium, and iron.

I’m not too sure why this is — I’m not a nutritionist!

But, once again, these are averages so not every Backpacker’s Pantry meal will be higher in all these categories than a comparable Mountain House one. If nutrition is important to you, spend some time comparing labels before buying.

If you want to know which of the meals we tested were most ‘nutritious’, here are the 3 with the highest vitamin and mineral content:

And here are the 3 meals with the most calories per serving:

Vegan, vegetarian, pescatarian, and gluten-free backpackers should also check out our guide to the best Good To-Go backpacking meals. Good To-Go makes plenty of nutritious freeze-dried meals that cater to these special diets.

Cost: Who Offers More Bang for Your Buck?

Of the meals in our tests, the average cost of a Backpacker’s Pantry pouch was nearly identical to that of a Mountain House pouch.

But recall that a Backpacker’s Pantry serving had over 100 more calories on average, making it a slightly better value in terms of cost per calorie. Although, since MREs tend to be relatively expensive, those on a tight budget should consider these other backpacking foods.

My Favorite Freeze-Dried Meals Come from Both Brands

Ultimately, like we said at the start, you should not focus on which brand is better but instead figure out which individual dishes you like best from each. I am guilty of carrying both brands in my pack.

On a recent weekend adventure, for example, I packed the following:

MRE weekend packing list

My advice?

If you can, spend a little extra money to buy some meals from both brands and try them out for yourself.

How We Compared

20 MREs, 5 participants and 2 very curious dogs piled on to the patio. The stage was set.

10 Mountain House meals and 10 Backpacker’s Pantry meals were all prepared for flavor testing. We judged them on their saltiness, sweetness, and spiciness (or lack thereof). We rated each product on their packability, nutritional content, weight, number of servings, calories, and how willing we would be to eat the meal multiple days in the row.

Taste testing with our dogs

By the end of the night, there were clear favorites. Some of us were nauseated, some were fleeing to the bathroom, others were bouncing off the wall and unable to go to sleep that night thanks to the sugar content. Others slept like babies.

Our focus group was made up of individuals with very different palates. It made for an interesting and quotable night.

For a more thorough explanation of our research, be sure to check out our complete rankings for each brand:


Leave a Comment